It has taken me several days to review the Ayers Scandal and why there was so much commotion and speculation regarding Ayers and his relationship with Obama. I ended up searching google.com to see if I could find what Sean Hannity was talking about on his radio show earlier this week. Hannity was playing a taped interview, from April 12, 2002, of Bill Ayers and comparing Ayers views to some of Obama's speeches and interviews. I was unable to find this subject on his website, and I was unable to find it on the Fox News website. I am really not savvy with websites yet, but I wanted to find it there, because Fox News is "fair and balanced". In any event, I located the
tape.
The YouTube tape was edited and cut in many ways, but the basic theme was to show the listeners how Ayers' leftist, Marxist, and anarchist views are the same as Obama's. On this particular version of Bill Ayers speaking in 2002, they showed an agenda from a symposium or conference that both men attended. On the
agenda it clearly states that Barack Obama and Bill Ayers not only attended, but that they were part of the discussion group. By the way, this event was co-sponsored by The Center for Public Intellectuals and the University of Illinois, Chicago. Please feel free to review the agenda, as I have a link to it. It clearly spells out what was to take place at this event. In addition, Ayers and Obama were not the only people in attendance. The list of other attendees looks like a who's who of Law, Medicine and policy makers within the Chicago area.
The YouTube video is the same format as what was on Hannity's show. However, I was able to pause and take notes of what both men have said in the past. The tape stated that Obama and Ayers were on the
Woods Fund of Chicago Board together. We know that, and that is how they met. The tape went on to say that Obama and Ayers were at 4 Board of Directors meetings together. The first thought that came to my mind was....were they carpooling? Of course they were at Board meeting together. I am proud that they took their community service seriously by taking the time to attend the meetings. I am not sure how that is related to Ayers political beliefs. But they wanted you to know that they attended these meetings together, because it is part of their 'palling around' scenario.
The next subject was on Ayers' view on crime. As a self-proclaimed anarchist, he does not feel that the drug laws apply to him. This is what he said:
"We create felons by having these archaic, puritan drug laws, that make no sense what-so-ever, in any logical way. So in that sense, I still feel like an anarchist. I don't feel that the rules apply and if they don't apply, I don't feel like you should follow them."
Now, this is what they used from Obama:
"...non-violent drug offenders, which has been the fastest growing category, should be treated as part of a public health problem, and that opportunity for us to use drug court and other diversion strategies....not sending to jail..."
You see, it was edited quite a bit. But, what I took from this is that our jail system is at capacity and if we can take non-violent drug offenders out of jail and get them help, maybe we help solve some problems. I did not see where he stated that we should just all have a party and break the rules. We have diversion for drunk drivers, why not non-violent drug offenders?
The next subject was on PATRIOTISM. This is a big subject with McCain. Is Obama a PATRIOT? How can he be if he is hanging out with DOMESTIC TERRIORISTS??? For heaven's sake, because he won't wear a pin? Because he has had a past business/civic relationship with a leftist radical from the 60's, who is now a well-respected college professor? Instead of wearing a pin, like a coat of armour, he felt that his actions of patriotism should speak for themselves. We see so many pins, the American Flag, a red ribbon, pink ribbon, a blue ribbon, a purple ribbon, a puzzle piece, and so on. A superficial act of wearing a flag pin does not change my opinion one way or another. His actions on behalf of his state, city and country are what matter to me.
They tried to tie Obama to Marxism by his believe of "spreading the wealth". The have the brief meeting with Obama and "Joe the Plumber". First, if he can afford to purchase a company that makes $250K, he is not just a plumber. Also, has he not heard of net income versus gross income? Why do you think you take your benefit payments out pre-tax? Also, with being self-employed, you are allowed to take deductions. Idiot. If I make $50K net and another makes $250K net, their 30% is not as much of a burden as my 30%, at least you hope not. In any event, he is not a Marxist. He is just trying to help the middle class and have the upper class, 5% of them, pay more. If I were to make that much money, I would certainly not balk at it.
The last subject is on the racial divide in this country. The tape elluded to Rodney King, LA Riots, Katrina, and frankly the racial divide. We have it, it still exists. I am angered by it. I was raised in an area that did not have much diversity. Our family welcomed all types of people into our lives. My father was really the one who was my role model regarding judging people or not judging people based on their belief system. I never heard him, nor my mother, say anything inappropriate. The "n" word was never spoken to me. I don't think I knew what it was until the Alex Haley TV movie "Roots". My history lesson will come later, because it is a long one on acceptance.
Suffice it to say, I did not see a parallel with what Ayers stated and what Obama stated. I believe Obama is his own person and should be judged for what he says, not what someone else has said. I still believe he is the right person for the job of The President of the United States. I believe he will do right by all of America.
Go Obama